Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Return-to-Sport: Effective Integration in Rehabilitation

In clinical practice, the integration of new modalities must reflect real-world constraints, including limited time, patient adherence, and functional goals. Despite extensive research on neuromuscular electrical stimulation, its use remains limited or inconsistent. By gaining a deeper understanding of its applications, we can optimize its clinical effectiveness.

1 - What if strength loss could be limited from the early weeks?

Following a major injury, such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, recovery extends beyond tissue healing. The primary challenge lies in restoring function. Despite well-structured rehabilitation, many athletes present with persistent quadriceps weakness, muscle atrophy, and arthrogenic inhibition, which can delay progression.

This raises an important clinical question: how can early rehabilitation be optimized to preserve muscle function and facilitate return to play?

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation offers a practical and evidence-informed response to this challenge.

1.1 - Recruiting what exercise alone cannot activate

The main value of neuromuscular electrical stimulation lies in its mechanism of action. Unlike voluntary contraction, it preferentially recruits type II muscle fibres, which are essential for force production and particularly vulnerable after injury. In the presence of arthrogenic inhibition, this capacity becomes especially relevant.

This modality helps overcome limitations in voluntary activation and maintain sufficient muscular loading. It does not replace therapeutic exercise but rather enhances its effects.

1.2 - Measurable gains influencing return to sport

The evidence supporting its use is high. For professional soccer players undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, neuromuscular electrical stimulation has been proven to safely and effectively restore quadriceps muscle mass and strength.

At the cellular level, early intervention has been shown to have positive outcomes. When initiated promptly after injury and continued for up to three weeks following surgery, it minimizes the atrophy of type II fibres and maintains the contractility of type I fibres.

A randomized controlled trial also demonstrated that adding neuromuscular electrical stimulation to early sit-to-stand exercises, performed between 15 and 60 days postoperatively, improves quadriceps strength and reduces interlimb loading asymmetry at both 60 and 180 days. These outcomes are associated with a faster and safer return to sport.

2 - The motivational dimension: an important driver of rehabilitation

Beyond its physiological effects, neuromuscular electrical stimulation offers a psychological benefit that is often overlooked: it helps sustain patient motivation throughout rehabilitation.

2.1 - Tangible results supporting engagement

For athletes accustomed to high performance, the early postoperative period can be particularly challenging. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation enables meaningful muscle contractions, even when voluntary activation is limited by pain or arthrogenic inhibition.

The ability to perceive muscle activation and observe measurable progress can strengthen patient confidence and support adherence to rehabilitation programs.

Literature highlights the importance of psychological factors in return to sport. High motivation, strong psychological readiness, and low fear of reinjury are associated with a greater likelihood of returning to pre-injury levels.

In this context, the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation also depends on patient profile. Motivated individuals, for whom this modality is meaningful, are more likely to benefit. Athletes aiming for a rapid and safe return to play are therefore particularly appropriate candidates.

Its integration should be guided by a shared decision-making approach that considers patient goals, preferences, and level of engagement.

2.2 - How to integrate neuromuscular electrical stimulation in clinical practice

The effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation depends on how it is implemented. Four principles can guide its integration.

1. Early implementation
   The first weeks represent a critical window. Early use helps limit muscle loss and supports quadriceps recovery.
2. Combination with exercise
   Optimal results are achieved when stimulation is combined with functional exercises. Superimposing stimulation onto voluntary contractions, including both concentric and eccentric actions, can enhance strength gains.
3. Parameter adjustment
   Stimulation parameters should be adapted to clinical objectives and the stage of rehabilitation. Moderate frequencies are commonly used for motor activation, with adjustments based on functional demands.
4. Integration into a global return-to-play strategy
   Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is most effective when embedded within a structured and comprehensive approach. It should be combined with:
   • Gradual load progression
   • Objective performance measures
   • Assessment of psychological readiness
   • Mechanical stress quantification

This alignment supports clinical decision-making and contributes to a safe return to sport.

3 - Key points for practice

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is a relevant tool for early intervention on muscle function. It can also support patient engagement and improve recovery trajectories.

However, its effectiveness depends on alignment between the modality, patient goals, and motivation. Athletes engaged in a structured and goal-oriented return-to-play process are particularly appropriate candidates.

When used alongside therapeutic exercise and integrated into a comprehensive strategy, it can enhance clinical outcomes. Its use should be guided by shared decision-making in order to support adherence and maximize long-term benefits.

References:

Ardern, C. L., Taylor, N. F., Feller, J. A., & Webster, K. E. (2013). A systematic review of the psychological factors associated with returning to sport following injury. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(17), 1120-1126. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091203

Babault, N., Cometti, C., Maffiuletti, N. A., & Deley, G. (2011). Does electrical stimulation enhance post-exercise performance recovery? European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(10), 2501-2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2117-7

Ekizos, A., & Santuz, A. (2023). "Biofeedback-based return to sport": Individualization through objective assessments. Frontiers in Physiology, 14, 1185556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1185556

Gabbett, T. J. (2020). How much? How fast? How soon? Three simple concepts for progressing training loads to minimize injury risk and enhance performance. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 50(10), 570-573. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2020.9256

Herring, S. A., Putukian, M., Kibler, W. B., et al. (2024). Team physician consensus statement: Return to sport/return to play and the team physician: A team physician consensus statement—2023 update. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 56(5), 767-775. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003371

Hickey, J. T., Timmins, R. G., Maniar, N., Williams, M. D., & Opar, D. A. (2017). Criteria for progressing rehabilitation and determining return-to-play clearance following hamstring strain injury: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47(7), 1375-1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0667-x

Labanca, L., Rocchi, J. E., Laudani, L., et al. (2018). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation superimposed on movement early after ACL surgery. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 50(3), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001462

Malone, J. K., Blake, C., & Caulfield, B. M. (2014). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation during recovery from exercise: A systematic review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(9), 2478-2506. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000426

Menezes, M. A., Menezes, D. A., Vasconcelos, L. L., & DeSantana, J. M. (2022). Is electrical stimulation effective in preventing or treating delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in athletes and untrained adults? A systematic review with meta-analysis. The Journal of Pain, 23(12), 2013-2035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2022.05.004

Taradaj, J., Halski, T., Kucharzewski, M., et al. (2013). The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on quadriceps strength and knee function in professional soccer players: Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. BioMed Research International, 2013, 802534. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/802534

Taylor, T., West, D. J., Howatson, G., et al. (2015). The impact of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on recovery after intensive, muscle damaging, maximal speed training in professional team sports players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 18(3), 328-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2014.04.004

Toth, M. J., Tourville, T. W., Voigt, T. B., et al. (2020). Utility of neuromuscular electrical stimulation to preserve quadriceps muscle fiber size and contractility after anterior cruciate ligament injuries and reconstruction: A randomized, sham-controlled, blinded trial. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(10), 2429-2437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520933622